Which day is going to hurt, and whether the pace you have assumed is realistic.
Statistics turns the plan into numbers you can compare. Every active day gets a difficulty score, and the charts show distance, climbing and required pace side by side so an unreasonable stage stands out before you are standing at the bottom of it.
Distance alone does not tell you much — 90 flat kilometres and 90 kilometres with 1,500 metres of climbing are different days. The difficulty score combines both into a single 0–10 figure, so stages are comparable at a glance.
The formula is deliberately simple and published rather than hidden: distance in kilometres plus climbing in metres divided by 100, all divided by 12, capped at 10. A 90 km day with 900 m of climbing scores 8.3 — hard.
Give a day a start time and a target finish and Statistics can answer the question that actually matters: how fast do you have to move to make that window?
It reports two figures. Moving pace excludes your daily overhead — the cafe stops, the punctures, the photographs. Overall pace includes it, which makes it the number to check your watch against mid-ride. If overall pace looks fine but moving pace looks brutal, your overhead assumption is the problem, not your legs.
Profiles are drawn from the real GPX track, smoothed to remove barometric noise, and shown either per day or as one continuous profile across the whole trip with cumulative distance along the bottom.
The whole-trip view is the one people find most useful when deciding whether a plan is sane — it makes an unbroken week of climbing obvious in a way a table of totals never does.
The backbone of every trip. One row per stage, with everything else in the app hanging off…
Read more →🎯The screen you actually use while moving. One stage, what is left of it, and whether you a…
Read more →🔴One public link for everyone at home, and precise control over what it reveals.…
Read more →Free while in early access. A couple of minutes to set up.